AREFMB.COMMulticultural Reflections

Personal essay · American identity · September 11

September 11 in a St. Louis High School

On September 11, I entered a suburban St. Louis high school as a 17-year-old, newly naturalized American. The day made belonging feel suddenly fragile—but what followed taught me why young people and parents can retain faith in America’s capacity for courage, decency and inclusion.

September 11 belongs first to the people who were killed, to the families who still carry their absence and to those whose courage and sacrifice revealed the best of America under attack.

Written on September 12, twenty-five years later, this is a reflection after the anniversary itself: on what a seventeen-year-old saw in a suburban St. Louis high school, and what the day came to mean with time.

The terrorist attacks inflicted mass death and lasting trauma. Passengers and crews, office workers and visitors were taken from their families. Firefighters, police officers, emergency medical personnel, military personnel, public servants and ordinary citizens moved toward danger, helped strangers and gave of themselves without knowing what the next moment would bring. Any personal reflection on that day must begin with them.

For young people who feel singled out or outside the group, the present moment does not have to define the rest of their lives. For parents, teachers and friends, the responsibility is to protect without making someone feel permanently marked. Belonging can take time; decency, engagement and service are ways to help shape what comes next.

Before 2001, September 11 was also my twin sisters’ birthday.

They were born thirty-five minutes apart on September 11, 1988, at the hospital within the Saudi Aramco compound in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. I remember saying goodbye to my mother before she went into the hospital. For the next thirteen years, the date belonged to our family.

Then came September 11, 2001: an act of terrorism that transformed a family date into a national day of grief, remembrance and resolve.

I was seventeen and beginning my senior year of high school outside St. Louis. I had become a United States citizen in October 2000, less than a year earlier. By definition, I was American. I did not yet understand what that meant as clearly as I would after that morning.

Naturalization had not visibly changed my daily life. I returned to the same school, saw the same friends and worried about the same things. I cared about grades and college, but I also cared about the difficult adolescent project of fitting in. By senior year, I had finally found a regular group of friends and a path that seemed to converge with theirs. We discussed many of the same universities and imagined recognizable versions of the same future. It was the closest I had felt to being normal.

I had spent a little less than half my life outside the United States—in Scotland, Ireland and Saudi Arabia. Immediately before moving here, I attended American schools and lived in a protected residential compound that approximated an American suburb in a foreign country. It gave me familiarity with American life before I fully belonged to it. I understood the references, spoke the language and felt culturally close, yet still sometimes regarded myself as an outsider.

On September 11, citizenship stopped feeling like a legal event that had happened the previous year. It became a question of identity, loyalty and how other people saw me.

My first-period class was marketing. The classroom was lined with rows of Macintosh computers, much like other school computer rooms of that era. Early in the period, the student beside me saw something on the internet about an airplane striking the World Trade Center. The information came in fragments. One airplane became two. An accident became an attack.

During the passing periods, the scale of the event became clearer, although its meaning remained difficult to absorb. Televisions were brought into classrooms. Students and teachers watched the same images repeatedly. Even before we understood the full toll, accounts of extraordinary bravery were becoming part of the national story: people helping colleagues descend darkened stairwells, first responders climbing toward danger and strangers caring for one another amid fear and confusion. Some of us went on with ordinary work because we did not know what else to do.

The first jokes and comments also began that morning. Some came from people I still considered friends. They may have been nervous or thoughtless rather than malicious, but I was suddenly part of the subject. Terrorism and Islam had become connected in the public imagination, and I looked Muslim. Until then, I do not know how many classmates thought of that first when they saw me. That day, I began thinking about it myself.

In another class—an elective about challenges to democracy—we had recently studied the Taliban and its treatment of the Afghan people. My teacher cautioned students against giving people who looked like me a hard time. The remark was humane and necessary. It was also an early indication that the day was happening to me differently.

At lunch, speculation traveled faster than confirmed information. A classmate joked that Pakistan had rushed to deny responsibility before anyone had accused it. The comment was absurd, but it captured the atmosphere: countries, religions and millions of people were being compressed into a single, frightening category.

By fifth-period AP English, our normally engaging teacher was visibly somber. In brief and more eloquent words than I can now reproduce, he told us that we were witnessing an event of historic consequence and that we would remember the day for the rest of our lives.

During that period, I was called to the school office with other Muslim students. Administrators wanted us to know that they understood we might face hostility and that the school intended to protect us. Their purpose was decent. At seventeen, however, being separated from everyone else—even for protection—made the distinction unmistakable. The effort to reassure us also confirmed that we had become a group requiring reassurance.

My position felt internally contradictory. I was a naturalized American citizen, a Muslim with Pakistani roots and a teenager whose closest friends were American. None of those facts had changed overnight. Their relationship to one another had.

When I returned home, both of my grandmothers were living with us. They ordinarily depended on others to turn on satellite television from Pakistan. That afternoon, they watched the same American coverage as the rest of the country. The images crossed generations and languages more easily than any explanation could.

In the years that followed, I came to understand more fully how September 11 altered public life. Airports, wars, immigration, citizenship and religious identity all acquired new associations. Comments that initially seemed isolated became part of the background experience of appearing Muslim in public. The attacks did not make me less American, but they made me more conscious that legal belonging and social belonging are not always experienced in the same way.

I also came to see the school’s response with greater generosity. Teachers and administrators were improvising under extraordinary circumstances. Their instinct to protect students was a modest expression of the same civic responsibility visible across the country that day. Friends sometimes said careless things because they were frightened and seventeen. Acknowledging the effect of those moments does not require turning every person involved into a villain.

That is the part of the experience I do not want to simplify. The country I encountered that day was capable of suspicion and welcome at the same time. People could single someone out while trying to protect him. Friends could make a person feel foreign without intending permanent harm. A newly naturalized citizen could feel both more vulnerable and more invested in the country he had joined.

My experience left me optimistic—not because acceptance is automatic, but because people can learn, institutions can protect and someone who once felt peripheral can come to understand that the American story is also theirs to help shape.

September 11 remains my sisters’ birthday. It is also the day my citizenship became more than a document. I began the morning as a teenager trying to fit in and ended it understanding that being American could include disagreement over who appeared to belong. The tension has never entirely disappeared. Neither has the welcome.

But my experience is not the measure of that day. The enduring measure is the human cost of terrorism and the lives of those who met catastrophe with gallantry, selflessness and service. Remembering September 11 means honoring the dead, standing with the injured and bereaved, and preserving the example of people who placed the lives of others before their own. Their sacrifice is not background to this reflection. It is the reason for it.

Continue with AREFMB

Read freely. Stay connected if this perspective is useful.

Subscription is optional. Join for future essays and research updates, or continue with Aref’s history, geography and personal reflections on TVAREF.

Editorial note: This is a personal recollection. Dialogue and classroom remarks are reconstructed from memory, and no private individuals are identified.